Would you choose the 29P configuration again?

The wording may be abbreviated because these were originally production codes rather than consumer descriptions. “Customer Preferred Package 29P. This code identifies a factory option package or special-edition equipment group” is a reasonable plain-English reading, but the exact implementation should be verified for the 2018 model.

1 likes

This sounds more like a documentation mismatch than a decoder error. Different databases often shorten the same factory description in different ways.

2 likes

Before buying, I would inspect the relevant component and take a photo of its label or part number. That often resolves whether the vehicle still has the factory configuration associated with 29P.

0 likes

If you are documenting the vehicle, save both the original wording and the readable explanation. That preserves the factory terminology while making the record understandable later.

3 likes

The wording may be abbreviated because these were originally production codes rather than consumer descriptions. “Customer Preferred Package 29P. This code identifies a factory option package or special-edition equipment group” is a reasonable plain-English reading, but the exact implementation should be verified for the 2018 model.

0 likes

This sounds more like a documentation mismatch than a decoder error. Different databases often shorten the same factory description in different ways.

6 likes

Good point about not posting the full VIN. I will compare the part number and connector before deciding on the retrofit.

0 likes